Response to Comment on "Revised paleoaltimetry data show low Tibetan Plateau elevation during the Eocene"

Svetlana Botsyun (1, 2) , Yannick Donnadieu (1, 3) , Pierre Sepulchre (1, 4) , Camille Risi (5) , Alexis Licht (6) , Jeremy K. Caves Rugenstein (7)

1 LSCE - Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette]
2 Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen = Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen
3 CEREGE - Centre européen de recherche et d'enseignement des géosciences de l'environnement
4 CLIM - Modélisation du climat
5 LMD - Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539)
6 University of Washington [Seattle]
7 MPI-M - Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie

Valdes et al. contest our results, suggesting failings in our modeling approach as well as in our comparison with data. Although their comment points to interesting ideas of improvement, we find that their critique reflects an incomplete understanding of our methods and is not supported by the material they provide.

Domains: Digital Libraries [cs.DL]

Svetlana Botsyun, Yannick Donnadieu, Pierre Sepulchre, Camille Risi, Alexis Licht, et al.. Response to Comment on "Revised paleoaltimetry data show low Tibetan Plateau elevation during the Eocene". Science, 2019, 365 (6459), ⟨10.1126/science.aax8990⟩. ⟨cea-02316802⟩