# Activity determination of 60Co and the importance of its beta spectrum

2 LNHB - Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel
DM2I - Département Métrologie Instrumentation & Information : DRT/LIST/DM2I
Abstract : The activity concentration of a $^{60}$Co solution was measured by means of two 4$\pi\beta$-$\gamma$ coincidence counting systems using a liquid scintillation counter and a proportional counter (PC) in the beta channel, respectively. Additional liquid scintillation measurements were carried out and CIEMAT/NIST efficiency tracing as well as the triple-to double coincidence ratio (TDCR) methods were applied to analyse the data. The last two methods require computed beta spectra to determine the counting efficiencies. The results of both 4$\pi\beta$-$\gamma$ coincidence counting techniques are in very good agreement and yield a robust reference value. The initial activity concentration determined with liquid scintillation counting was found to be significantly lower than the results from 4$\pi\beta$-$\gamma$ a coincidence counting. In addition, the results from TDCR and CIEMAT/NIST show some inconsistency. The discrepancies were resolved by applying new beta spectrum calculations for the dominant allowed beta transition of $^{60}$Co. The use of calculations which take screening effects as well as the atomic exchange effect into account leads to good agreement between all four methods; the combination of these techniques delivers an important validation of beta spectra.
Keywords :
Document type :
Journal articles

Cited literature [27 references]

https://hal-cea.archives-ouvertes.fr/cea-01799862
Contributor : Léna Le Roy <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, February 11, 2020 - 10:37:15 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, February 12, 2020 - 1:23:01 AM

### File

Openaccess_KarstenKossert_Appl...
Publication funded by an institution

### Citation

Karsten Kossert, Justyna Marganiec-Galazka, Xavier Mougeot, Ole J. Naehle. Activity determination of 60Co and the importance of its beta spectrum. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Elsevier, 2018, 134 (SI), pp.212-218. ⟨10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.06.015⟩. ⟨cea-01799862⟩

Record views